Rebecca Roiphe

@rroiphe

Law professor , former Manhattan ADA, history PhD, Mom, fan, writes about criminal justice, legal ethics, and prosecutors.

New York
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @rroiphe

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @rroiphe

  1. 2. velj

    But using ethics as a weapon will undermine the ability of the profession to serve as a neutral mediating force in democratic institutions. Those of us who believe in prosecutorial independence and disinterested legal opinion should be careful not to play this game./end

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 2. velj

    When is acting as an advocate, he should not claim that he is a disinterested expert. /5

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 2. velj

    This doesn't mean that we cannot point out ethical issues. For instance, as argued, it may be problematic for WH Counsel whose client is the presidency to defend Trump in an impeachment hearing. /4

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    Others have argued that Cipollone lied when he suggested that Republicans were excluded from certain house depositions. (MR 3.3(a)) I think without knowing exactly how he meant this, calling for discipline is extreme. /3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    Cipollone and possibly Sekulow may have been fact witnesses if witnesses were ever called. People have claimed this violated the advocate-witness rule (Model Rule 3.7) but they were effective lawyers for their clients and as we know, witnesses were never called. /2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 2. velj

    THREAD: We should stop using legal ethics as a weapon to threaten and punish the other political party. /1 makes this argument. h/t

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij
    Poništi
  8. 28. sij

    I think the tone of this article is off but I agree that while Dershowitz's argument was brilliant advocacy, it showed a severe lack of respect for the discipline of history. This refusal to credit expertise is a disease of our time.

    Poništi
  9. 27. sij

    For a President who likes ratings, this must be a disappointment. These lawyers are deadly.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    NEW: Rudy Giuliani tells me he wasn’t at April 2018 dinner and *didn’t even meet Parnas or Fruman until June 2018* contradicting on that men were at April 2018 dinner w/ because of their relationship with Giuliani

    Poništi
  11. 24. sij

    So happy that my mentor and role model agrees with me!

    Poništi
  12. 24. sij

    Hakeem Jeffries sounds patriotic and optimistic as he talks about American character. This is rhetoric that has in recent history belonged to the right

    Poništi
  13. 23. sij

    Turley, the expert called by Republicans in the House, just confirmed on that Dems we’re quoting him accurately that it does not have to be a crime to be an impeachable offense.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    In which I disagree with my co-blogger on whether Trump was impeached for merely behaving like a politician.

    Poništi
  15. 23. sij

    This is a good thread addressing what I think is the best argument against impeachment.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Hakim Jeffries just made a key point: “At no time was there a federal investigation of the Bidens.” The U.S. never sub-contracts corruption investigations of Americans to foreigners.

    Poništi
  17. 22. sij

    In addition to laying out the evidence, the managers are providing a lesson in civics.

    Poništi
  18. 21. sij

    I'm honored to win this award from the NYSBA!

    Poništi
  19. 21. sij

    For instance, what if Trump's personal attorney were to tell Trump that it looks better for him to turn over all evidence and documents and WH Counsel had a different view based on the effect of such disclosure on executive privilege and future presidencies? /end

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 21. sij

    And insofar as the objection is that Cippolone is WH Counsel and serves the presidency, not Trump, it seems appropriate for WH Counsel to represent the president because there may be issues that come up that bear on the presidency. /2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·