I've been trying to figure the essential _features_ of the The Ethereum (computer) vs. mere _implementation_ "details"; so far have come up with: 1. strong integrity protection for your code (customarily called "smart contract"), 2. strong availability for your code. (1/)
-
-
Users want to be sure their transactions are: * Pseudonymous (which is often confused for private!) * Safe (free of unintended side-effects) * Unstoppable (some validator can always be accessed and used. Most users expect this to be a 3rd party, which breaks the model.)
-
Interesting you're looking at things from the transactions pov, while I'm seeing things from the computing platform pov.
-
The users in the space are somewhat odd, they want an alternate computing substrate, but they don't entirely realize this, so it requires looking at the problem from top and bottom. The general ignorance regarding anything RF in the space is almost as troubling as the OPSEC.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.