@jckarter @mjtsai @curtclifton Coz, it’s not like Apple can’t add final to all public API even if it’s not a language default. :)
-
-
@roopeshchander@jckarter@curtclifton the realities of developing apps are not appreciated/understood. Old system was accidentally good. -
@roopeshchander@jckarter@curtclifton Or the thinking behind it was forgotten. -
@mjtsai@roopeshchander@curtclifton We won't take subclassing or dynamic away. Stronger guarantees allow for new design choices. - View other replies
-
@jckarter@mjtsai@roopeshchander@curtclifton Polymorphism is the basis of good OOP; final by default == program to concrete implementation - View other replies
-
@_danielhall@mjtsai@roopeshchander@curtclifton Polymorphism doesn't have to mean implementation subclassing. - View other replies
-
@jckarter@mjtsai@roopeshchander@curtclifton So, after devil's advocating, I now agree 100% with the proposal: http://www.danielhall.io/swifts-final-countdown … - View other replies
-
@_danielhall@jckarter@mjtsai@curtclifton I don’t think we’ll get a protocol-oriented UIKit for a few decades (because Obj-C). -
@_danielhall@jckarter@mjtsai@curtclifton So I think this default final is really only about how we want Swift and its packaging to work. - View other replies
- Show more
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Curt Clifton
Michael Tsai
Joe Groff
JΛЯΣD
Roopesh Chander
Daniel Hall