@ron_fournier @chucktodd I'm for accountability but the devil's in the details. Would c4s have to disclose their donors? Under what circs?
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@ron_fournier@chucktodd I submit that there's so much money in politics bc there is so much to be bought. Less rules/regs = less $ -
@bhweingarten@instapundit@ron_fournier@chucktodd The return on investment for buying politicians is huge, thus it happens. -
.
@wingod@instapundit@ron_fournier@chucktodd Conversely, pols extort groups by threatening legislation, hence attractiveness of extenders -
@bhweingarten@instapundit@ron_fournier@chucktodd Yep I was there the day that the judiciary committee declared war on@BillGates
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ron_fournier@chucktodd I agree we need to shine a light on dark money. My#DISCLOSEAct would do exactly that: http://1.usa.gov/1zwPHaA - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@ron_fournier Otherwise, the@chucktodd amendment will have ads listing series of PAC donations instead of the actual donors.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ron_fournier@chucktodd Also must ban or limit committee roulette. So Donor A can't "wash" money by giving to PAC B, which gives to PAC C.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ron_fournier@chucktodd Require media outlets who have taken sides in races to reveal dollar value of promoting/attacking candidates?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ron_fournier@chucktodd // Dark money !!! Chuck Todd is a racist !!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.