Roko Mijic

@RokoMijicUK

Rationalist. Follower of the truth. Creator of "The Most Terrifying Thought Experiment of All Time" {Programming, Math, AI, Science}

Europe
Vrijeme pridruživanja: siječanj 2018.
243 fotografije ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @RokoMijicUK

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @RokoMijicUK

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    17. sij

    You can read more about the space runway here: And here: And here:

    1 reply 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 5 sati

    My theory makes short work of the Mary's Room thought experiment. When Mary sees red for the first time, she doesn't learn any new fact, but she gets to *be* a physical system experiencing Red. The difference between knowledge of redness and redness is indexical.

    2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. prije 5 sati

    To some extent the computational processes in one person's head at one time and another's at another time are identical. Then they can apply the you=S condition and be sure about the experience. This is confusing for us because of our sense of individual identity though.

    1 reply 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. prije 5 sati

    Different humans are biologically different organisms but computationally the same; we all have almost the same POVself. Thus it makes sense to make a deal with all sufficiently similar computational processes to treat each other well. But that's really all it is - a deal.

    1 reply 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. prije 5 sati

    A system S only has a truth value about whether it is really experiencing qualia Q if you=S. This is even true for past and future versions of you, since they are different physical systems.

    1 reply
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. prije 5 sati

    Or whether physical system S "really sees red", "really experiences pleasure", etc. These objective facts about subjective existence just don't exist. The problem then is how to explain your own experiences, how to deal with other humans' experience-claims, etc.

    1 reply 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. prije 5 sati

    I think I have a solution to the hard problem of consciousness. Not sure how original it is. I will call it "Qualia Relativity" The reason we can't seem to solve the hard problem is because we set up an observer-independent fact about whether physical system S "is conscious".

    1 reply 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. prije 7 sati

    The graph of Tesla's stock must be horrifying to any who is short. Anyone who is long just made 2-3x their money, possibly more.

    1 reply 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. prije 9 sati

    See also:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. prije 9 sati

    Full post on the subject:

    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. prije 9 sati

    I nominate this tweet by as pretty much the most apt and pithy summary of the 2010s and likely the 2020s as well.

    Gradient descent can write code better than you. I'm sorry.
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 19 sati

    Our generation is mostly atheists wishing that they weren't.

    5 replies 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 37 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. 2. velj

    Zack Davis bites an important bullet!

    Odgovor korisniku/ci @charlesmurray
    I'm actually going to bite this bullet. Like, you know, not deterministically linked, but correlated. Someone like me who couldn't think the same kind of thoughts would be living an impoverished, less-valuable life—just like I'm living a less-valuable life than my IQ 180 analogue
    1 reply 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. 2. velj

    Episode number 2 of "Blockchains will re-make all the mistakes of offline/real life politics, only faster and with more buzzwords", by

    Translation to social-democrat speak: "If we had more proper robust publicly funded services, we wouldn't have so much of our society taken over by powerful corporations offering second-rate privatized substitutes" Interesting the parallels. So so interesting.
    3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    This is barely better than ELIZA.

    Wow: Google's "Meena" chatbot was trained on a full TPUv3 pod (2048 TPU cores) for **30 full days** - That's more than $1,400,000 of compute time to train this chatbot model. (! 100+ petaflops of sustained compute !)
    14 replies 41 proslijeđeni tweet 308 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. 2. velj

    Which world would you rather live in (In US/W Europe): 1950s social "technology" (social norms, roles, expectaions, traditions) + 2020 material technology OR 2020s social technology + 1950s material technology

    6 replies 1 proslijeđeni tweet 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I don't know if somebody coined this already but the rule seem to be: "The majority of the above-sustenance-resources will be always used to wage zero-sum status wars" Although in the general case it's still better to live in a high GDP p/c country, just not by the % difference

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 2. velj

    Others are healthcare (US especially) and education. +-10% of GDP per cap - about 5 years' growth - is basically irrelevant in practice but in discussions people think of it as being a big deal.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 2. velj

    When I hear "X would reduce GDP" as an argument against X, I'm increasingly skeptical. GDP per cap in the west doesn't matter, because we spend most of our money on things like houses/rent whose prices track GDP perfectly. Our world is just kind of broken on this issue.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 2. velj

    Our culture here in the west has started to worship nature, probably as we search for a replacement for Christianity. Global warming is seen as a sin against Gaia and carries a special taboo. Real x-risks like AI and bio are less legible, and we have got used to nuclear.

    It baffles me ongoingly, but a bunch of smart, concerned people seem to genuinely believe that climate change poses an existential risk to humanity. WTF.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    1 reply 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    There are gonna to be real existential risks emerging in the next decades -- like synthetic-bio weapons designed by military AGIs -- let's hope they're not ignored due to "boy who cried wolf" phenomena triggered by fallacious worrying about existential risk from climate change

    9 replies 9 proslijeđenih tweetova 71 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

@RokoMijicUK još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·