Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @roeslpa

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @roeslpa

  1. 8. sij

    Please spread the word to people w/o Twitter. If you're not at , we'll certainly set up a communication platform for future discussions and let you know. This meeting is only aimed to start a process and initiate a debate and not aimed to produce solutions yet.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 8. sij

    At a group of people will start to think about ideas how we as a research community (within the ) can reduce the impact on climate w/r/t how we conduct, organize, and publish our research. Join us on Thursday 12:45 during lunch in the back of the hall.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. sij

    If only Merkle trees were producing O2 rather than being used to produce CO2...

    Poništi
  4. 29. stu 2019.

    Still we are on the streets to fight for the future of generations 💚

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. stu 2019.

    The Call for Presentations for 2020 has finally started! The is open until 13th Jan. Submit your proposal early to increase your chances and celebrate our 5 year with us! 😀

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. lis 2019.

    They want us to contribute free work that will be gated from those who cannot afford it. I refuse to cooperate and hope that you will refuse as well.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 20. ruj 2019.
    Poništi
  8. 18. ruj 2019.

    As in many cities in Europe and around the world, our group in Bochum organizes a huge demo for action against climate change on Friday. Check it out in your city and be part of it such that politics react finally.

    Poništi
  9. 4. ruj 2019.

    In the afternoon session of impressively showed us how "competition" in standardization is used to confine the research in post-quantum secure crypto.

    Poništi
  10. 4. ruj 2019.

    Great morning session by about how to get your theoretic work into practice and for which standardization bodies it makes sense to contribute (and for which maybe not) at summer school.

    Poništi
  11. 27. kol 2019.
    Poništi
  12. 8. kol 2019.

    Less than one month left and you can still register for free (also for only selected days) for our summer school on security and crypto. The program is now online and looks really interesting: (I can especially recommend the crypto standardization day 😉)

    Poništi
  13. 15. srp 2019.

    If you are interested in visiting a summer school on crypto and IT security *for free*, including great insights into standardization of research by and a completely biased view on the NIST PQ standardization effort by , register at:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. lip 2019.

    Man kann sich nur schämen so etwas in der Zeitung zu lesen. In erster Linie hilft es den Menschen an Bord! Sind wir als Gesellschaft so tief gesunken?

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. svi 2019.
    Poništi
  16. 17. svi 2019.

    On the train to & hope to see you! Looking forward to talk at the secure messaging workshop about the importance of clear research on ratcheting. Btw, my student Marco implemented our strong ratcheting protocol from :

    Poništi
  17. 9. svi 2019.

    Here's our (w/ , ) computational analysis of Noise (by ) within a flexible generalization of the ACCE model. Our model aims to grasp the core concept of secure channel establishment independent of a composition/instantiation:

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Poništi
  18. 9. svi 2019.

    German minister of justice demands instant messengers to be interoperable. Internet-freedom folks say: "Stupid politicians!" I would say: "Should be much easier and more secure than deploying TLS on the Internet (especially when having MLS)." Any scientific counter arguments? 🤔

    Poništi
  19. 6. svi 2019.

    Here is a better written blog post (than my thread) about how receipt notifications increase the security in : Btw, if you are interested in the crypto behind messaging, consider to join the WSM workshop at :

    Poništi
  20. 28. tra 2019.

    Why two messages? Because Signal generates a new DH exponent not on sending but on the receipt before (so the exponent maybe remained in the state for a while). The first message's ack, hence, lets a new DH exponent being generated and the second message finishes the DHKE. 5+2/5

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·