"exposure to a disruptive peer in classes of 25 during elementary school reduces earnings at age 24 to 28 by 3 percent." https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160763 …
-
-
Still wondering if this is due to "unruly children tend to associate with other unrulies."
-
"we ask whether students in cohorts with an idiosyncratically high number of disruptive peers have worse long-run educational and labor market outcomes than students in the same school whose cohort had fewer disruptive peers" https://www.nber.org/papers/w22042.pdf …
-
But regardless, it would be hard for anyone to show that more unruly students makes for better outcomes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.