I feel it’s more nuanced that that. But I give up, none of you are ever going to believe me... so I’m done with this topic because it’s exhausting and I’m literally just going to end up not wanting to be bothered to help anymore if it keeps up...
-
-
Replying to @robertoblake @DaniAlexMusic and
Ok, what is the help on this subject of demontisation, as youtube can't give me any
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DocSquiffy @DaniAlexMusic and
I’ve given it multiple videos, podcasts and interviews. If ppl are going to make a go at being a content creator, none of it should rely on Adsense period. A diversified model. One that even protects you in the event of view suppression or algorithm shifts or cancel culture.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @robertoblake @DaniAlexMusic and
So nothing specific , don't think anyone commenting disagrees with that . They just have there opinion on things which gets over looked . Not always an argument . Not always meaning they aren't successful. Doesn't mean the process is correct and should be accepted
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DocSquiffy @DaniAlexMusic and
Here is the reality of the majority of the content that doesn't get demonetized. I covered this in a video on how to basically 10X your CPMs: - No cursing - SFW (Safe For Work) - Captions to rule out false positives False positives can occur. Advertisers get to decide on spend
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robertoblake @DocSquiffy and
So what do you think is the insensitive for YT to push non monetized videos? They make money off monetized videos don’t they want to make money ? (Playing devil’s advocate)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaniAlexMusic @DocSquiffy and
Google's business has always been data collection. YouTube videos regardless of monetization give them leverage on marketing their metrics against TV advertising as a whole for buy-in. I worked in advertising btw. Also, BIG DATA is worth more than ADS...always has been.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robertoblake @DocSquiffy and
Okay but can’t a a single “bad actor” destroy their market value? Would it not make more sense to collect the data from people they have vetted via the partner program then just random data (again playing devils advocate)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaniAlexMusic @DocSquiffy and
The DATA is from the VIEWERS... the 2 BILLION PEOPLE LOGGED IN every single month... vs the 78M content creators... Creators and the Core 50M-100M viewers that are the "YouTube Community" our outnumbered by the average consumer at scale... That is the business driver.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robertoblake @DocSquiffy and
I am talking about the viewers. Would the not study the VIEWERSHIP of vetted channels over unvetted channels that potential could be “bad actors” and using bots or other tricks
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Vetted channels aren't immune, and that would be a form of favoritism beyond the natural favoritism that occurs in any ecosystem. Contrary to popular belief there is no whitelist. You can have 5M subs and tons of views and not get special treatment...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.