Opens profile photo
Follow
Robbie Orvis
@robbieorvis
Senior Director of Energy Policy Design . Working to drive down greenhouse gas emissions through smart and innovative policy. Tweets are my own.
DC Areaenergyinnovation.orgJoined June 2012

Robbie Orvis’s Tweets

Pinned Tweet
🧵1⃣ This morning we () released our assessment of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) on emissions, jobs, health impacts. In short: this is a BIG deal. Topline: the provisions in the bill could reduce US emissions to 37-41% below 2005 levels in 2030
Image
19
357
754
Show this thread
A new analysis by demonstrates the clear benefits the Inflation Reduction Act would have for our planet, economy, and health. This legislation would: Slash emissions by 37-41% by 2030 Create 1.5 million jobs by 2030 Prevent thousands of premature deaths
Quote Tweet
1/ 🚨🚨Our modeling of the #InflationReductionAct is out & the findings are unequivocal-- this is the biggest climate investment in US history. Full results here: bit.ly/3ORxdKt, & a 🧵 w/ highlights
Show this thread
9
12
24
NEW: An analysis by has found the Inflation Reduction Act will create millions of jobs, reduce premature deaths from air pollution, and put the U.S. on a path to roughly 40 percent emission reductions by 2030. It will save lives, create jobs, and reduce costs.
Quote Tweet
1/ 🚨🚨Our modeling of the #InflationReductionAct is out & the findings are unequivocal-- this is the biggest climate investment in US history. Full results here: bit.ly/3ORxdKt, & a 🧵 w/ highlights
Show this thread
114
138
476
The Inflation Reduction Act seems likely to cross the legislative finish line. My analysis of its economic impact will be out tomorrow. In preview, while much smaller in scale & scope than the original Build Back Better agenda, it will have a material beneficial economic impact.
Image
21
292
1,055
Show this thread
Very promising! In addition to cutting costs for consumers, says the #InflationReductionAct “is the most significant federal climate and clean energy legislation in U.S. history, and its provisions could cut greenhouse gas emissions 37-41% below 2005 levels.” ⬇️
Quote Tweet
1/ 🚨🚨Our modeling of the #InflationReductionAct is out & the findings are unequivocal-- this is the biggest climate investment in US history. Full results here: bit.ly/3ORxdKt, & a 🧵 w/ highlights
Show this thread
4
12
40

Topics to follow

Sign up to get Tweets about the Topics you follow in your Home timeline.

Carousel

8⃣ While not perfect, the IRA would be the most significant climate and energy legislation in U.S. history by a wide margin, putting the U.S. much closer to achieving its target of 50-52% below 2005 levels in 2030. With executive and state action, that goal would be in reach.
7
15
77
Show this thread
7⃣ In the Low scenario these are more pessimistic while in the High scenario they are more optimistic. In 2030, the IRA provisions reduce emissions 870 MMT to 1,150 MMT CO2e compared to BAU, which drops US emissions to 37-41% below 2005 levels.
1
2
24
Show this thread
6⃣ We built three scenarios - Low, Moderate, and High - in addition to our BAU scenario, which reflects current policies. In 2030, our BAU scenario is 24% below 2005 levels. Our three IRA scenarios reflect varying assumptions about uptake of the provisions in the bill.
1
2
31
Show this thread
4⃣ Avoided premature deaths: 3,700-3,900 in 2030. As a percentage reduction in deaths, these reductions tend to be concentrated in communities of color, which have historically born the brunt of local air pollution.
Image
3
13
62
Show this thread
2⃣ On the new oil and gas supply pieces: We conclude that these are likely to cause <50 MMT of increases, offset by 800-1,100 MMT of reductions. For every 1 ton from oil and gas supply, there's at least 24 tons of reductions from other pieces. Our assumptions are conservative.
7
25
95
Show this thread
And, I believe only a small share of those have go into production.
Quote Tweet
Two tidbits on BOEM offshore oil and gas lease sales: 1. In the past 10 years, there have been 22 lease sales offering an average of 45 million acres each 2. An average of 1.96% of offered acreage has actually been leased at each sale. boem.gov/oil-gas-energy
2
13
I’ll agree and go further: asserting it’s a poison pill is untethered from any serious analysis that understands how global energy markets work or, as points out, how lease auctions translate to production and emissions.
Quote Tweet
Disagree that O&G leasing provisions is poison pill. - Lease sales are not production. When BOEM offered 75M acres 2021, <3% was leased. - Most O&G firms don't see oil demand growing. - IPCC says 2050 gas at ~50% of 2020 use even in 1.5C world. cnbc.com/2022/07/28/man
1
9
57
Show this thread
Disagree that O&G leasing provisions is poison pill. - Lease sales are not production. When BOEM offered 75M acres 2021, <3% was leased. - Most O&G firms don't see oil demand growing. - IPCC says 2050 gas at ~50% of 2020 use even in 1.5C world.
13
42
145
Precisely this.
Quote Tweet
"We can't miss the forest for the trees here because literally the forest will burn down if we do." @leahstokes outlines why the climate benefits in the reconciliation bill are worth the compromise for public land leases for oil.
Embedded video
2:00
36.8K views
1
3
Our team is reviewing the text of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and will have full modeling of the emissions impact next week, but our initial review, based on our earlier modeling, suggests that a 40% reduction relative to 2005 is a plausible outcome.
9
50
200
Many corporations claim to care about the climate crisis. Now would be a great time for them to SPEAK UP about how Senator Manchin walking away from the climate deal is disastrous. Do you work in corporate America? Tell you leaders you want them to use their voice NOW.
14
98
406
When Sen. Joe Manchin walked away last week from negotiations over the energy and climate spending package, he blamed inflation. But many economists say the kinds of policies Democrats are pursuing would actually relieve pressure on consumers.
1
9
10
Nice reporting by for on the disinflationary nature of the climate and energy provisions of reconciliation and that there is agreement among economists that it would help, not inflame, inflation.
Quote Tweet
Sen. Manchin said he walked away from the climate package because of #inflation. But are wind, solar and EV credits inflationary? eenews.net/articles/manch
1
4
18
41% of the inflation Americans are feeling is directly tied to volatile fossil fuel prices. We need to connect the dots here. Breaking free from our fossil fuel addiction is how we deliver families some much needed relief in their monthly budgets.
67
205
630
Media - if you are interviewing Manchin and he claims he cares about inflation, you have an obligation to point out that study after study have shown that the reconciliation bill is DEFLATIONARY. Please.
7
43
201
A million times this.
Quote Tweet
I'd really like to see some reporters ask Manchin to defend his (false) assertion that a package that raises more revenue than it spends and accelerates the transition away from volatile fossil fuel prices would be inflationary. Don't let him hide behind falsehoods. twitter.com/mkraju/status/…
3
8
Stopping pipelines is good, but it has next to no climate impact. The DPA can help with building stuff, but not at the scale needed. We need legislation (plus standards) that is focused on deploying as much clean energy technology as fast as we can.
3
3
15
Show this thread
Congress needs to be clear-eyed about what is at stake without significant legislation on climate. Trying to get to our goals with out legislation is nearly impossible. Declaring a climate emergency, even if the right thing to do, is not going to fundamentally solve that problem
2
8
32
Show this thread
1. Duh. Many of us having been saying this for a while. I’m glad to see classical environmental economics catching up. 2. I’m stunned to see an admission by economists that carbon pricing might not be a superior policy (especially because it’s a political nonstarter). Kudos.
Quote Tweet
Excited to release nber.org/papers/w30263 with @BorensteinS, which we could have titled “Everything we thought we knew about market mechanisms for dramatically reducing electricity sector greenhouse gas emissions is wrong”. Thread:
Show this thread
Image
3
11