Meaning they got a 100x perf improvement? Sounds like they would have had algorithmic technical debt.
A Google org once complained their rewrite from Java to Go had made things 10X slower until they noticed the graph was in micros not millis. https://twitter.com/c_bonnell/status/878379587566260225 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Damn that's some serious perf possibilities. I was just getting interested in Erlang but may have to give Go a go...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Haha, nice, about 100x faster than Java
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure that is not to say that Go is really 100x faster. I'm sure there are tradeoffs on perf and it depends on what you are doing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LOL. Java is a dead end, but for languages like Ruby, they sometimes get a slight boost from jRuby using the JVM's JIT. smdh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd love to see
@golang's gc drop under 100ms for "halt the world" from what I've read. I grew up doing ns level coding already. -
It's now under 100 micro secondshttps://groups.google.com/forum/m/?fromgroups#!topic/golang-dev/Ab1sFeoZg_8 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not saying it's so, but maybe they used System.currentTimeMillis() rather than System.nanoTime() for the java benchmark...
-
Haha!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.