it's wild how the problem people have with harvard is that the unaccountable committees who determine who rules and who is ruled, who's allowed to succeed in life and who isn't, is trying to do social engineering *in ways they don't like*
-
-
...and traders could profit by making incremental improvements in determining these metrics!
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This comparison is beyond worthless: Pools of debt were valued completely quantitatively (albeit incorrectly) on public info, while Harvards position is that their secret inhouse qualitative analysis can, and often should, override any numerical formula.
-
Their secret inhouse qualitative analysis can still be gamed, and there are a lot of people who are very invested in trying to game it. (If a professor assigns essays instead of objective tests, you can still suck up to him for a better grade.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.