if that's accurate, one would expect some writer somewhere to already have compared it to the trump election, which the Narrative regards as voters just throwing a tantrum for no reason at all
-
-
Show this thread
-
in reality, the primary and the general were both decided on the issues. trump won because both clinton and his republican competitors adopted unpopular positions on the issues - esp. immigration and trade
Show this thread -
(also, of course, clinton being the unpopular wife of a controversial former president, el jebe being the dopey mexaboo brother of an uncontroversially awful former president, and cruz having the charisma of a fungus-sprouting cum sock. but also the issues)
Show this thread -
what's more of an indictment of a voting population? voting for the one guy who didn't adopt disqualifyingly unpopular stances on important issues, or throwing out a guy no one had a problem with because hey look a squirrel
Show this thread -
somebody with more patience than me should look at the precinct-level data and see who it was that voted for pressley. (only released as badly put together pdf, of course.) city-level data sure makes it look like her demographic was rich swpls
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
decent chance Pressley winds up (nominally) more in the middle than he was too
-
didn't she admit she was very slightly to his right on the all-important* Issues * until both parties realized their positions were unpopular and deserved to be, and decided, no, they'd rather not change them despite that
-
saw some Bernie types saying she had given mixed signals on stuff like banking regulations. Capuano misstepped for the district a bit by calling Kaepernick divisive + supporting a Blue Lives Matter bill
-
well, you can't win both everett and swplstan
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.