Would 2 tests so close together for one player suggest target testing was in play?
Rioli update A positive drug test for cannabis in-comp. As it happened on Sep 5, which was before he was notified of on Sep 11 of his alleged substitution, it is considered a concurrent and not a consecutive matter. So is still facing one consequence. Whichever is worse.https://twitter.com/DanielCherny/status/1176330674682265601 …
-
-
-
If a player (allegedly) attempted to substitute a sample one day then it is guaranteed they would be target tested very soon afterwards.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Indeed. It does give us food for thought on motivations for the alleged tampering. The positive certainly does little to help his defence......stating the obvious!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Looking at four years now. I thought 2 beforehand, but the full force of the law will be sent his way imo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So whichever charge has a potential for a greater punishment will be the charge that’s prosecuted?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One more positive test more than the essendon 34. Has to get 4+
-
Hahahahahaha Haha
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.