This idea that HTML is somehow nice for UI's isn't actually true.https://twitter.com/molecularmusing/status/1223583157930336256 …
-
-
What it took for me to figure it out is building code-editors. Anything out of the primary usecase-flow of HTML and you learn its a very domain specific renderstack.
Prikaži ovu nit -
If you look at a basic JS UI from a systems point of view the 'total system complexity' becomes absurd. Megabytes of JS on top of a JS engine on top of a 'nobody knows how it works' CSS engine and render engine. Thats a LOT for a todolist or a button.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
What about Bodil html React like lib for Rust?
-
Doesn't matter how you' create' the HTML, in the end yr still wrestling that render engine to do basic things. I wasn't even talking about backend complexity, that ones a big party as well and using Rust there does help a lot.
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
> Yes it has nice fontrendering Doesn't that depend on the browser implementation? Also I love how the font rendering goes to hell as soon as you have a composited layer.
-
Well, let's say in general it has nice font rendering. I notice very little diff between the competing browsers. (safari/chrome/firefox) but DIY'ing it is a huge project.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.