After reading @RickHasen's "debate" with Whelan, I looked back at my blog post about a discussion, on the same general topic, that I had with Whelan a couple of years ago. 
https://concurringopinions.com/archives/2015/12/posner-segall-v-scalia-whelan.html …
#ELB: The “Whelan Way:” Ed Whelan’s Bad Faith and Nasty Attack on My Book on Justice Scalia’s Legacy http://electionlawblog.org/?p=98592
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At some point he’ll challenge you to a duel. Stay out of New Jersey.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am not a scholar, but as an outside observer this Hasen/Whelan debate looks like Kerr/McCarthy. The Californians win both.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ed's eventually gonna have to charge you rent for all the space you're taking up in his head
-
Hasen might have grounds for a battery charge given how many times Ed just dunked on him.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for your service. Whelan has always appeared to use ad hominem because he lacks the intellectual capacity for real debate. He likes his originalism easy and unquestioned.
-
No one said originalism is easy. Scalia himself said it was too hard to implement in practice, because of the radical changes that it would require, now that 90 of what the Federal government does is unConstitutional.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
sacalia was an ass
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.