"Most of [@EdWhelanEPPC]’s critiques are wild reaches, the sort of sad attempt to cobble together a jigsaw puzzle of nits and out-of-context quibbles into a grand unifying conspiracy theory against his judge that’s almost admirable because it clearly comes from a place of love.."
-
-
Show this thread
-
"..but one passage is just so bonkers it boggles the mind that it made it to print." --
@JosephPatriceShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“It’s almost as though jurists have long understood that words impart meaning beyond their life as acontextual playthings to subject to linguistic contortions.”


I was not expecting this to be the most interesting thing I’ve read all day!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Those "conservatives" are kinda slow.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. Morality informed statutes prohibiting both homicide and sodomy statutes. Why would it only be permissible in the former context? 2. Why does it matter that Sotomayor is “Latinx”? Are such people incapable of acting thuggishly?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From a career perspective, it surely will.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.