Agreed that analytically they're totally distinct such that formal hold is inappropriate. I'm just wondering if members of Court relate them nonetheless, i.e., someone wants to dissent from PA denial of cert and refer to his (not yet released) op. in pending case.
I don’t think so because this case raises claims under the STATE Constitution and the Elections Clause. Wouldn’t hold for other gerrymandering caseshttps://twitter.com/ssamcham/status/974403444445450240 …
-
-
-
Well, we're going to have a PA Congressional primary on May 15,. They want to wait until June?
-
I think you can take that as (effective) denial of the stay.
-
Honestly, once we got to February 27, when nomination petitions began circulating for Congressional candidates, that to me was an effective denial (as to both the MD PA and SCT matters.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.