-
Show this thread
-
Three
#SCOTUS justices continued Scalia's skepticism in dissent, and two others concurred arguing that *reliable* legislative history is useful:pic.twitter.com/qqNC9qLkfo
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
Replying to @chris_j_walker
Yes, here's what I wrote at @theNLJ about the continuing fight over Justice Scalia's ideas about textualism:
https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2018/02/22/in-pair-of-opinions-justices-take-up-anti-textualism-cause/ … cc: @KannonShanmugam
0 replies
2 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.