So they’re having problems with their command of the substantive law as well as their command of rules of evidence and procedure...
Well that’s just plain dumb. Fraud requires intenthttps://twitter.com/bryanlowry3/status/972199441942839302 …
-
-
-
So why not resort to redefining words?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Black's Law Dictionary (Free Online, 2d Ed.): Fraud consists of some deceitful practice or willful device, resorted to with intent to deprive another of his right, or in some manner to do him an injury. As distinguished from negligence, it is always positive, intentional.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shocked, shocked I say, to see it's von Spakovsky issuing such an opinion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Luckily, Judge Robinson is not dumb.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is a witness testifying as to the definition of fraud? Doesn’t the judge know what fraud is? It’s not a question of fact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whole lotta dumb all over these days
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.