On the other hand, it's pretty easy to find any five payments that total $130k. These are not even five consecutive payments, and are not all payments in that time period.
This alone doesn’t prove intent was campaign-related but then looks like Cohen lied about reimbursementhttps://twitter.com/theviewfromll2/status/972169650535653376 …
-
-
-
Looking at the data, in ~2 min I was able to fine more than a dozen occurrences of five consecutive payments totaling between $129k and $131k.)pic.twitter.com/AtE9CYLziZ
-
In fact, four of those 13 occurrences were in that same month. This strikes me as confirmation bias, not evidence.
-
(Of course, I could be completely wrong about this, and nothing would make me happier than for these terrible people to be caught because of their terrible opsec.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@TheViewFromLL2 they made similar disbursements to Trump properties every month. Most months after he was the nominee it was aporox $180K to Trump Tower. In November it was over $400K If those disbursements point to illegality it’s the jump in fair mrkt value from June to AugustThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We can all stop pretending that there was anything remotely legal about this transaction or that 45 wasn’t directing the action.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.