Seems odd on basis of agreement (tho i'm not a lawyer so i have no clue) that the LLC can seek relief in this way as opposed to DD/Trump/Crazy Person. Doesnt the agreement envision Trump doing this?https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/971614792455630848 …
The agreement as I read it gives DD certain rights but it lets any party to agreement seek arbitration over dispute as to agreement
-
-
arbitration clause only applies to “claims or controversies arising between DD on the one hand, and PP on the other hand”
-
same provision repeatedly uses the term “Parties” for other purposes, so court likely to find that parties intentionally limited arb clause
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wouldn’t “DD” have had to sign the agreement to have rights? Isn’t that the entire basis of Daniels’s lawsuit?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.