Rick, do we know for a fact that Cohen went as rep for LLC as opposed to counsel for DD?https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/971606918799048704 …
-
The caption lists the parties as the LLC and PP. no DD in sight. And question whether DD is even a valid party
Not just the caption. Arbitrator refers to EC’s application for emergency relief. No mention of it being on behalf of DD.pic.twitter.com/CQfVTWZCfh
-
-
Note how the agreement’s first para. elides the distinction between EC and DD (with EC paying the $), and the notice provision effectively identifies EC as DD’s agent; undoubtedly structured for this purpose — to support an argument that EC has standing to enforce on DD’s behalf.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.