So the arbitrator had the power to issue the temporary restraining order without notice to Daniels because the confidential agreement alllowed it, according to the arbitrator http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/TODAY/z_Creative/arbitration%20TRO.pdf …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @rickhasen
Sounds reasonable, even without specific inclusion in the agreement, but it's *temporary* isn't it, till a two-sided hearing can be held? Also, the TRO would be subject to the contract being valid, which is the question in the Cal. court now.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @erasmuse
Yes but Arbitrator says the right to do this without notice is expressly given in the contract
8:34 PM - 7 Mar 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.