#ELB: New Paper of Mine forthcoming in the Annual Review of Political Science: “Polarization and the Judiciary” http://electionlawblog.org/?p=97943
Show this thread
-
On the Supreme Court, for example, the Court often divides along party and ideological lines in votes in the most prominent and highly contested cases. Those ideological lines now overlap with party ...
Show this thread
as we enter a period in which all the Court liberals have been appointed by Democratic Presidents and all the Court conservatives have been appointed by Republican Presidents.
-
-
This has led to a surprising rise in both the number of decisions at the Supreme Court decided by one vote AND the number of unanimous decisions which are part of the Court's coordination and unifying functionpic.twitter.com/WQxaKEeCXT
Show this thread -
Third, increasingly polarized judicial decisions appear to be causing public to view judges and judicial decision-making though a more partisan lens, at least when considering public attitudes about the United States Supreme Court. Look at volatility of public opinion by partypic.twitter.com/ZPV5vLSelj
Show this thread -
Fourth, polarization may affect the separation of powers, by empowering courts against polarized legislative bodies which sometimes cannot act thanks to legislative gridlock, as my work, and Bill Eskridge's work, have shown. /fin
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.