The “no endorsement” is more important, at least for understanding the current dynamic of the CA Democratic Party’s base, than the endorsement would have been.http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-california-democratic-party-endorses-xx-1519534142-htmlstory.html …
-
-
All endorsements are here:https://www.cadem.org/vote/endorsements …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually, no they aren’t. We’ll see what we can get that’s comprehensive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep, this PDF is the final list... https://www.cadem.org/convention/body/CDP-Convention-2018-ConsentCalendarReports-18-02-25.pdf …
-
How do I read the objection in CD 45? That’s where two of my colleagues are ruining against each other and against Mimi Walters and others
-
-
Is there a meeting on
#CA39? Why "No consensus?" -
Because back in January, a preliminary meeting and vote resulted in split delegates in CA39, where no candidate got half of votes that day. That automatically means a party endorsement is off the table at convention.
-
Thank you for that explanation. That is very helpful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.