Rick HasenVerified account

For one, sexual orientation is a protected class whereas NRA membership is not an innate and immutable characteristic. Second, and much less importantly, same-sex couples haven’t asked for an LGBT discount, which is a special benefit—not equal access.

Ah, so boycotts are only allowed on certain topics? Do you first amendment at all?

Seriously, if you say “boycotts are only okay regarding certain topics and viewpoints only” you’re doing the First Amendment wrong

A boycott, in the sense you're using it, is by definition, "withdraw from commercial or social relations with (a country, organization, or person) as a punishment or protest." The 1st A only applies to the gov't, not to private citizens. That's 101-level stuff.

We’re talking about whether they are legal. That’s a government issue

Except that the thing you seem to consider a boycott (refusing to serve gay weddings) actually isn't - as @AnthonyMKreis already explained. It's class-based discrimination. You're doing a reverse "No true Scotsman", which is just as fallacious.

I notice Kreis likes grouchy claiming it is not a boycott, but ignores when I show by definition it is