Primary boycotts, sometimes. Secondary boycotts, not so much. It's the mindset that led Christians to refuse to buy from Jews/infidels/sinners. Tolerance for differing views and ideals is better all around, especially for minority groups.
Far from corrosive, Such boycotts allow opposition to noxious ideas in a peaceful and productive way. It’s good for people and groups tone accountable. No free ride for hate.https://twitter.com/jadler1969/status/967446675869618178 …
-
-
-
Yes, like when the Civil Rights movement simply asked for tolerance and it was given, never once taking economic action as an aggrieved minority group.
-
Which protested governmental policies via the corporate agents that made use of said policies - which is a secondary boycott, no?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can disagree with the NRA's positions on the Second Amendment, but how the fuck is it "hate"?
-
The left gets to decide what hate is. Right has no say in the matter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What do you mean by, "no free ride for hate"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
With all due respect that is a giant steaming load of buffalo poop. If its something progressives like then opposing it is "hate" or whatever "ism". If its something yall hate then opposing it is undefiled righteousness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who defines hate? Or noxious ideas?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.