Why would a private individual have standing to sue for the Legislature's (alleged) injury under the elections clause?https://twitter.com/SaulZipkin/status/965757609503612928 …
I don't concede on injury. But gotta go now. Enjoy the federal courts discussion.
-
-
Assignments to the "wrong" legislative district have been held sufficient to give rise to Art. III standing in many contexts. I think prudential standing is your best counterarg. And you're descriptively right about AIRC ruling sending bad signals about Court's position on merits
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.