Why would a private individual have standing to sue for the Legislature's (alleged) injury under the elections clause?https://twitter.com/SaulZipkin/status/965757609503612928 …
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
If the state supreme court's map assigns a voter to a different congressional district than the legislature's map, such a reassignment could constitute an injury-in-fact. Lance v. Coffman is the major obstacle to standing here, but didn't expressly discuss that issue.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michaelmorley11
But the injury is to the Legislature's power, not the voter's. I don't see it. And there are other standing (Lance) and abstention issues, not to mention the merits.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
On the merits, I think the argument is much stronger than you do. Historically, several state supreme courts have held that state constitutions don't bind a legislature when drawing cong'l districts. US House of Reps once resolved a congressional election contest on that basis
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michaelmorley11 @rickhasen
Several commentators from the past century, in completely nonpartisan contexts, endorsed the "independent state legislature" doctrine, as well. And the Court's language (dicta?) in McPherson v. Blacker embraces it too in Article II context.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I can't imagine the courts going down this road now, especially after the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission case.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.