I suspect the PA Supreme Court will rely on the Article I, Sec 5 "Elections shall be free and equal" clause in the state constitution for its reasoning
I'm talking about their legal argument: no explanation of why and how state constitution requires these technical standardshttps://twitter.com/politicswolf/status/961073061838467073 …
-
-
-
Yeah but we shouldn't have to be guessing at this point
-
I agree. I appreciate that they wanted to issue the order ASAP to reduce election disruption, but a full opinion should have come by now. Could a dissent be holding it up?
-
I've seen dissents come later. Fairly common in emergency situations
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree they sadly did not at all explain their legal argument. But the GOP trope that PA court ordered a new map without giving any guidelines for a legal plan is not correct. They listed compactness & the integrity of counties, cities, townships, & in a second order, precincts
-
And I thoroughly agree with this sentiment. It made sense given timelines of filing deadlines/primaries not to issue an immediate decision, but this delay has been too longhttps://twitter.com/stevenmazie/status/961073253061136384 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.