Seems to me that if the NY Times still had a readers' advocate (and a good one like @Sulliview) we would have had an answer to this question by now.
It is really the most perplexing part of the Times' coverage decisions in runup to 2016.https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/959546633288585216 …
-
-
Liz
@spaydl? Atrocious. In Sept 2016 she literally dismissed idea of journalists deeming emails as less important than when Trump asked Russia to hack us. "Remember that?" she snarked in a column...
Egregious. So @WiseWmnTogether drew:
vs 
http://bit.ly/FalseBalance Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you know where Liz Spayd works now? FaceBook. The same FB which showed the Russian ads to us. The same FB which is a cesspool of fake news. Let that sink in.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Spayd criticized this article and then got fired
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fantastically tone deaf and arrogant in her defense of NYT’s penchant for sucking up to power instead of holding the powerful to account.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah that headline is still burned into my brain because I believed it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Many people with much for which to answer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.