And I wonder if the coverage, and elite opinion and even the election might have been different if the awful @spaydl had not been the public editor during the election period.
Show this thread
Seems to me that if the NY Times still had a readers' advocate (and a good one like @Sulliview) we would have had an answer to this question by now.
It is really the most perplexing part of the Times' coverage decisions in runup to 2016.https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/959546633288585216 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.