The result of siding with Pa Republicans in this case would mean that state courts could NEVER review a state legislature's congressional redistricting plan to make sure it complies with state law and the state Constitution.
Show this thread
I don't think so. Even if you read legislature to exclude the initiative process, it doesn't mean that legislature excludes application of state constitution by state Supreme Court. That position did NOT get Kennedy's approval in Bush v. Gore Article II concurrence.https://twitter.com/michaelmorley11/status/958192758564573185 …
-
-
-
Aside from the absurdity of this position it would put an even greater burden on the Supreme Court, which would get mandatory direct appeals of these cases from three-judge federal courts. THAT cannot be appealing to Chief Justice Roberts.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.