You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I'm on the road. Can anyone tell me if NC Supreme Court 4-3 decision divided along party lines of the elected justices?
This makes the separation of powers reference to John Orth’s work (which Justice Newby co-authored) quite amusing. I actually took Justice Newby’s State Constitutional Law class while he was working on this with John Orth, one of the best classes I ever took.pic.twitter.com/BRlXHuUq0Y
Was Newby one of the dissenters?
He was, and even wrote his own dissent separate from Martin’s on basis that the matter is a nonjusticiable political question. See pp. 52-74, considerably longer than Chief Justice Martin’s dissent, too. https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=1&pdf=36529 …
How did they reason that questions over whether acts of the legislature violated separation of powers was a political question? In some sense literally everything the legislature does is a political question.
Dissents from Newby, Jackson and Chief Justice Martin, all Republicans.
Again...I don't even know which side is correct, but more proof that judges just vote with their party.
If course they do Gorsuch doesn’t even try to hide his republican affiliation.
No one does.
So Justice is not blind, and never has been. The facade is wearing through. Darn Internet!
...and you are cited in Chief Justice Martin's dissent on page 49 in footnote 3!
Even justice is political
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
