You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
#ELB: “Federal Court Dismisses Case Claiming That Trump’s Ongoing Business Interests Violate The Constitution” http://electionlawblog.org/?p=96548
The NYT push notification I just got says "President Trump not in violation of the Emoluments Clause, a judge ruled, dismissing a suit accusing him of profiting through his office." But that's not right, is it? Didn't say he's not violating
It's about standing and political questions, not a ruling on the merits
The first write through in the @nytimes on the Emoluments story is not much better than the inaccurate push notificationhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/us/politics/trump-suit-constitution-business.html …
WTF I’m not seeing his logic. Seems to be clear to me. It’s a violation
Plaintiffs in a case have to show that they have standing, that is, that they have a tangible interest in the case and/or stand to suffer personal injury. The principles are complicated and counterintuitive to a layman. The plaintiffs can appeal.
If being a citizen of the USA is not enough “standing” in a case accusing the president of the USA of violating the constitution, what does amount to enough “standing”?!?!?!
That's not right. It was dismissed for lack of standing.
That judge needs to be under a microscope... sounds about as competent as one of Trump's nominees...
Anxious to see response, not too happy with this decision.
What a bunch of BS not because I do not agree with findings but that there is no violation.....
Wait? What???!!!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
