Thanks. I will grant that it is not the slam dunk I saw with the statutory language and with those present at the creation of the Vacancies Act. Can you then explain why no TRO?https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/935730482637082624 …
Big burden to get TRO, particularly when there are reasonable legal arguments in both sides
-
-
Not saying lower court got it right. I'm saying we can't dismiss decision as a partisan decision by a "Trump judge." This is nowhere near the kind of norm-breaching Trump has been doing
-
Important to hold biggest fire for greatest breaches of democratic norms
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.