Explain why you believe this is a close textual question.https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/935664133474631680 …
-
Jonathan seems right in practical terms about how the courts will decide (and now, one has decided) - but his analysis notably doesn't really analyze textual (or leg history) claims.
-
-
Yes, I read them (well, actually just the White argument on his side). I see both arguments but find Lederman/Mendelson more persuasive.
-
Thats fine but I don't think you can say the other side is out of bounds in its arguments. Perfectly reasonable even if incorrrext
-
Yeah, I agree upon reflection- the rhetoric is over the top. I hadn't been reading it but now I see Twitter exploding and it's ugly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.