Interesting proposal, the counter argument is that things could go underground and there would be less transparency. Also wouldn’t be fool proof as you might think that there candidate could connect the dots regarding falling contribution if s/he started advocating...
-
-
-
different proposals. So if s/he changes position on,say, easing taxes on rich and saw a subsequent change in donations, you can still anticipate some corrupting influence
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.