Not when an election has already started----military and overseas voters have been voting pursuant to federal law. More on public interest in not cancelling election here: http://electionlawblog.org/?p=95963 https://twitter.com/hughhewitt/status/930094104649744384 …
-
Show this thread
-
And,
@hughhewitt, under 17th Amendment Strange was the temporary senator and so his leaving now would not trigger a new election which state must hold.2 replies 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
There IS a constitutional way to deal with problem of voters regretting primary vote for Moore: RNC can get behind write-in campaign for Luther Strange. Voting can continue, and if political will he wins.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
This,
@hughhewitt, gives all voters a chance to participate in election already underway AND allows Republican majority to unite behind Republican candidate, as Alaska voters did with Murkowski write in after she lost primary to tea party guy1 reply 3 retweets 11 likesShow this thread
And even further, @hughhewitt, I've argued that if Rs can convince Moore to drop out Republicans should be able to pick new candidate for general, so long as it wouldn't disenfranchise military voters http://electionlawblog.org/?p=95923 (Just as Ds did in NJ)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.