Voters always vote knowing new information can be brought forward. These voters with Moore remorse can vote for a write-in, or another candidate in the race. We can't have a rule that says do-overs whenever new material information comes forward after a primaryhttps://twitter.com/lordsutch/status/929489209727086592 …
-
It’s an argument against early voting, though, no?
NO! Voters in early voting always have a choice to wait until the last minute to vote. Those who are willing to take the risk get greater convenience and less chance of being disenfranchised.
-
-
Results skewed in sense it reflects collective decision based on different information inputs
-
Question is what you’re trying to maximize Participation/individual choice Quality/consistency of collective action
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.