That is, I think Republicans just as much as Democrats should be able to pull a Torricelli if doing so would give voters a meaningful choice.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't change the law when the results go against you. Elections are not permanent. There will be another one. Remember that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The GOP nominated this guy. I'm sure they (like most companies & cults) vetted their own candidates, no? Re-do because they got caught?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait, Rick. Are you saying you support court overriding the law as written? I know it's been done before, but please elaborate if you will.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are already two write-ins, could courts bypass signature requirements and put them on the ballot?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
send military/overseas voters a new ballot, that will supersede old one if cast by deadline, but with a note that previously cast ballots for Moore OR for GOP straight ticket count for replacement if new ballot not voted.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By what legal right do political parties get to do this for *their* nominee?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aw, c'mon y'all. This election is legit and is tee'd up to take place. There are two qualified candidates on the ballot and the election must go forward. The rest is all political posturing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.