It’s an argument against early voting, though, no?
Voters always vote knowing new information can be brought forward. These voters with Moore remorse can vote for a write-in, or another candidate in the race. We can't have a rule that says do-overs whenever new material information comes forward after a primaryhttps://twitter.com/lordsutch/status/929489209727086592 …
-
-
-
NO! Voters in early voting always have a choice to wait until the last minute to vote. Those who are willing to take the risk get greater convenience and less chance of being disenfranchised.
-
Results skewed in sense it reflects collective decision based on different information inputs
-
Question is what you’re trying to maximize Participation/individual choice Quality/consistency of collective action
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Changing the ballot isn't fair to the
#UOCAVA voters who took the time to vote and postmark their ballots on time.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they don't want a pro-abortion Dem, then their only option is hold their nose and vote for Moore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And it's not like his candacy was above reproach from the beginning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
their responsibility at the very least nominate someone who wld step aside when new info comes out so they can get a conservative
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If Republicans can delay elections, they can eliminate elections...whither democracy then?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Hewitt’s “do over” argument seems to assume Moore is the only option in the general. I get the politics, but there’s no principle here.
-
Hewitt's do over assumes nothing except a Republican possibly not winning an Alabama seat in the Senate. It is nothing more than opprotunistic, factional hackery and this much discussion of its pris and cons is ridiculous.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And under their logic early/mail voters should get to re-vote if new info comes out. There is no principled standard that be rationally applied.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seriously. Was Scott Brown “representative” or did he sneak in during a weird special election with a shitty opponent?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.