“What Virginia tells us, and doesn’t tell us, about gerrymandering” http://electionlawblog.org/?p=95940 New Nick Stephanopoulos in @latimesopinion Attn: @jbarro
-
There are obviously maps with a large inherent partisan advantage (like those in Wisconsin) but the Virginia story is an incumbency story, not a gerrymandering story.
-
-
The fact that Northam won 58 House districts is also kind of irrelevant without context. For all we know, he may have won *more* without GOP gerrymandering
-
Illinois GOP Gov. Bruce Rauner won 58% of state House districts in 2014 when he won by 4% statewide, yet nobody in their right mind would say that gerrymandering doesn't benefit Dems there compared to nonpartisan maps
-
The results also weigh against this. The GOP almost certainly would've lost the Senate while winning the House had both chambers been up on Tuesday, given the Senate map & how Dems did in GOP seats Clinton won (the Senate has 4)https://twitter.com/jbarro/status/929046473626468352 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.