My question has to do with whether it is good or bad for American democracy that #scotus gets lots of election cases via mandatory appeal?
-
-
Primary job in deciding cases for Supreme Court to take is resolving Circuit splits, J Kagan says. Also when court strikes act of congress
Show this thread -
To prepare for oral argument. After Kagan reads briefs and bench memo, brings in all clerks for Socratic dialogue
Show this thread -
Kagan thinks about what points she wants to make at oral argument.
Show this thread -
Oral argument makes less difference than the briefs but oral argument sometimes makes Kagan go back and reconsider
Show this thread -
Kagan on statutory interpretation: there are more agreed principles than you'd think. If text clear that's it. Then structure,history,canons
Show this thread -
Mostly agreement on interpretation with some Justices at polar ends. Court is closer to Scalia pile. This is a textualist Court, Kagan says
Show this thread -
-
Scalia should have just declared victory on textualism and declared victory and not pushed for view to never cite legislative history
Show this thread -
Kagan: "I'm pretty much a textualist myself."
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At yesterday's talk, Kagan painted picture of collegiality among Justices. But
@NinaTotenberg says tension w Gorsuch http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/101717.html#073210 …Show this thread -
That's via
@howappealing linking to@FirstMondaysFM podcast (which I haven't heard yet)http://www.firstmondays.fm/episodes/2017/10/16/ot2017-3-nowheresville …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The need for explication is agonizing in composition and reading.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.