Think this is my first time stepping foot into @ChicagoKentLaw since I finished teaching here in 1997. Such wonderful memories...
Show this thread
What would be a good (and appropriate) question for Justice Kagan that you'd want answered? Not things she'd have to pass on answering....https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/919979521712979970 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
I of course put in an election law question into the stack of index cards J Kagan may answer
Show this thread -
My question has to do with whether it is good or bad for American democracy that
#scotus gets lots of election cases via mandatory appeal?Show this thread -
Here we go. J Kagan will be interviewed by Carolyn Shapiro
Show this thread -
Kagan agrees with what J Scalia said that you can't take it personally when Justices disagree in good faith
Show this thread -
Kagan says Chief is a great model for collegiality. Self interest keeps things cordial because Justices are repeat players
Show this thread -
Kagan: the best response to charges of scotus politicization is to reach consensus where they can
Show this thread -
after Scalia death, 8 person court silver lining was Justices had to keep talking even when it appeared 4-4. Try try try to break ties
Show this thread - 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If incoming justices agreed to step down after 18 yrs, wld the sitting justices also agree to retire, 1 every 2 yrs, in order of seniority?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I she were back at Harvard Law what would she be doing/saying about free speech clashes?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What vote if you had to do it over today do you think this court would decide differently after watching it play out?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why don't
#SCOTUS have audio or transcripts for opinion announcementsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it a good idea for justices to speak at conventions of ideological organizations such as Fed Sox, ACS?
-
I don't see the issue with it, for either side. More speech is always better as long as it stays within traditional judicial ethical norms.
-
I think the issue is more the appearance of seeming to commune with only one side.
-
There is far more diversity of ideas among the FedSoc membership than people realize. I assume the same is true of ACS too.
-
I wonder about that. Not sure there's an ACS corollary to the libertarian-social-conservative rift in Fed Sox.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.