I'll take a look, but I'm not sure why this would have the force of law in a felony criminal conspiracy case. Dubious Chevron applies.
-
If you want to agree that I have the text in my favor, and you have the broad purposes of Congress in your favor, that works for me.
Sorry no. I have both text and purpose in my favor, and your unusual reading comports with neither.
-
-
If Kerr is right - foreign nationals can contribute "things of value" to PACs and political parties.
-
How is that not contradictory, a contribution is a thing of value.
-
Things of value intended to include contributions other than $$. That's why the prohibition section says "as described in (a) and (b)."
-
thx, just read it. Kerr’s arg is that “as described” doesn’t include thing of value, only contribution or donation. seems dumb.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.