I think we agree the key phrase is this: "a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value." I read that as having two parts:
-
-
Well, I don't think you can avoid the statutory language by just describing the facts using the legal term. I don't think it fits.
-
Respectfully, I don't think I'm avoiding the statutory language. I think I'm applying it. But I guess we'll leave it there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rick has more persuasive argument re "thing of value." And any 1A impact on recipient (of info) cured by Elonis-style addition of mens rea
-
Trump effect? Agree with me and you are a winner.
-
And it's 2:21am and your still tweeting? Now I think Trump's habits are rubbing off on you. First, interpreting law to help Jr, now this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.