do you think that's an accurate characterization of what I wrote?
-
-
-
-
Replying to @kenvogel
Rick Hasen Retweeted Rick Hasen
in our exchange here: https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/862162573403312128 … The one where you said I should stop telling you how to do your job
Rick Hasen added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen @kenvogel
after I said we don't know what we don't know about any connection between the Trump campaign and Russia.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen @kenvogel
and this part in particularpic.twitter.com/KUhLvpe8sf
4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
That doesn't say that there was no proof of a connection b/t Trump campaign & Russian gov't. To assert it does is intellectually dishonest.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kenvogel
what does it say? This is how I interpret it honestly. I could be wrong, but that's how I read it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen
It says there's "no apparent smoking gun on Trump/Russia." That's v different from "no proof of connection b/t Trump campaign & Russian gov"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kenvogel
and I said we don't know what we don't know. On that you should have agreed. But you said I was telling you how to do your job and
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
you couldn't find anything and you'd be "surprised" if there was more. Seems reasonable to say you thought there was nothing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.