didn't you also tell me there was no proof of a connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government?
-
That doesn't say that there was no proof of a connection b/t Trump campaign & Russian gov't. To assert it does is intellectually dishonest.
what does it say? This is how I interpret it honestly. I could be wrong, but that's how I read it.
-
-
It says there's "no apparent smoking gun on Trump/Russia." That's v different from "no proof of connection b/t Trump campaign & Russian gov"
-
and I said we don't know what we don't know. On that you should have agreed. But you said I was telling you how to do your job and
-
you couldn't find anything and you'd be "surprised" if there was more. Seems reasonable to say you thought there was nothing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.