You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Possible defenses 1. No knowledge of foreign source (hard w emails) 2. Oppo research is not a thing of value (I disagree, based on FEC opns)
3. No serious enough to warrant criminal prosecution (this one seems important: presidential race, major foreign adversary meddling)
When you didn't setup the meeting and you received no information or opposition research, how would it be a crime?
There won't be any kind of prosecution because there's no crime:http://lawnewz.com/opinion/why-donald-trump-jr-is-innocent-period/ …
Actual professional federal prosecutors have said sonny's released emails give probable cause for arrest right now. "Innocent"? Shithead.
Oppo research clearly a thing of value. Campaigns, IEs pay people to conduct it. One-off negative info provided informally might skirt by.
If you are going to indulge in this fantasy, you have to put a value on the info. How much is info that is already known worth?
Does this apply to both TrumpJr/Russian and DNC/Ukrainian Embassy?
Serious question. If trump had paid for it, does that make it legal?
I love this. Every few weeks the MSM goes ape over the latest "conclusive proof of collusion." And then reality sets in until the next thing
Would you PLEASE stop being factual and reasonable?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
